Prioritize the endpoints that matter
Compare response time, throughput, error rate and Apdex by transaction. Use percentiles alongside averages to see slower requests.
APPLICATION PERFORMANCE MONITORING
From a slow checkout to a stalling API, connect transactions, SQL, external services and code. Give your team shared evidence to prioritize what affects users.
INSIDE A REQUEST
Choose a scenario to explore the overview, a selected trace and the next investigation step.
14:00–14:15 · v2.8.1 deploy at 14:07
Relationships observed in traces
Widths represent illustrative CPU sample shares, separate from the elapsed trace durations above.
This trace is one request. Parent spans include their children, so row durations are not added together. The p95 above summarizes the time window.
SELECT inventory takes 1,820 ms. Inspect its query plan, indexes, row counts and locks before choosing a SQL change.
Illustrative console and metrics explain the workflow; they are not customer results or performance guarantees.
FULL APPLICATION VISIBILITY
Use the right view for daily operations, incident diagnosis and validation after a change.
Compare response time, throughput, error rate and Apdex by transaction. Use percentiles alongside averages to see slower requests.
Inspect parent and child spans with per-step timings. Connect instrumented services that propagate trace context.
Map observed service relationships, then use latency and errors to choose where to investigate.
Separate database time, inspect trace-linked SQL and find N+1 patterns where query calls grow with item counts.
Inspect calls to payment, ERP and third-party APIs. Review endpoints, status and timeouts in the originating request trace.
Group exceptions and inspect stack traces, transactions and HTTP failures to distinguish code faults from failing service calls.
Use profiles and flamegraphs to inspect resource-heavy functions, compare periods and investigate slowness. Runtime support is validated first.
Use logs, infrastructure metrics and session traces when compatible data collection is configured. Additional tooling is scoped in the proposal.
Compare application versions and time windows with deployment markers. Investigate changes in latency or errors before attributing a cause.
Filter by host to distinguish service-wide symptoms from a single machine, using version and available resource context.
Use thresholds or anomaly baselines with configured email, Slack, Teams or webhook delivery. Plan maintenance suppression and test escalation paths.
Review requests, failures and Apdex in daily, weekly or monthly reports. Compare periods so developers and operations can track improvements together.
HOW IT CONNECTS
Compatible agents or instrumentation send telemetry to APM. User requests continue on the application path without passing through APM.
Cross-service tracing requires context propagation. Collection endpoints, sampling and data access are planned for your environment.
YOUR STACK, CONNECTED
Validate runtimes, versions and frameworks, select agents and test collection in a controlled environment.
Auto-instrumentation, custom spans, profiling and context correlation vary by language, version and library. We confirm compatibility, overhead and restart requirements before production rollout.
ENTERPRISE ONBOARDING
Ruk-Com helps plan collection and investigation workflows around your organization, with clear access and ownership.
Identify business-critical transactions, runtimes, hosts, owners and incident windows.
Define sampling, retention and masking for sensitive headers, queries or payloads. Test before collecting production data.
Validate trace continuity, metrics and alert delivery. Record normal behavior during a representative workload.
Prioritize findings with developers, define post-change comparisons and hand over runbooks and escalation contacts.
APM provides investigation evidence. Code, index and production configuration changes need assigned owners, approvals and testing under your change process. Managed operations and additional development work are defined in the proposal.
Working with our specialists across Technology and Cyber Security: monitoring, anomaly analysis, planning and coordinated response.
Technology · Performance, capacity and operations
Cyber Security · Risk, vulnerabilities and threat monitoring
Data access, changes and support levels follow the permissions and service scope agreed with our team.
Meet Ruk-Com AgentCLEAR PRICE / CLEAR SCOPE
Start with applications that affect revenue or service delivery, then expand coverage as evidence guides your priorities.
APPLICATION PERFORMANCE MONITORING
Share your machine count, runtimes and symptoms for a proposal with clear installation and support scope.
Machine and container counting, data volume, sampling, retention, access, setup fees, taxes and any additional integrated tooling.
BEFORE YOU START
Define clear boundaries to collect evidence your team can act on.
CPU and memory describe resource health. APM connects symptoms to transactions, SQL, external calls and code. Together they help focus application and infrastructure investigations.
No. APM identifies investigation targets. The team must analyze causes, choose changes, test and validate after deployment using comparable workloads and metrics.
It depends on the agent and configuration. Review headers, query strings, SQL parameters and request bodies; configure and test masking or exclusions, then agree retention and access before production collection.
Instrument the required services and propagate trace context consistently. Define service, environment and version labels. Machine or container billing units are confirmed before quoting.
Share your architecture, languages and versions, machine count, slow endpoints, incident windows and impact, along with owners and access restrictions, to define scope and success criteria.
LET’S FIND THE SLOW PART
Start with one critical endpoint and the question your team needs to answer.